EMS Consulting Group

Replenishment Pull System Case Study


April 1, 2008
By Darren Dolcemascolo

Pull is one of the key principles of lean thinking. There are essentially two different types of pull systems: sequential pull and replenishment (or supermarket) pull. In sequential pull, the downstream customer pulls parts from the upstream supplying process in the sequence in which the supplying process produces; that is the supplying process dictates the sequence of work. Sequential pull limits the amount of inventory between the two processes. In replenishment pull, the downstream customer pulls from a supermarket according to what it needs (based on a schedule dictated by its customer). The supermarket is replenished by the supplying process. In this article, I will describe a case study in which a California manufacturer implemented replenishment pull between an injection molding operation and two assembly cells.

The company had 12 plastic injection molding machines. Each produced a number of components that were assembled into a finished product by the assembly cells. Before the implementation the company had about 10 days of injection molded inventory (WIP). There were also a significant number of material shortages affecting the productivity of the assembly cells.

A kaizen team consisting of a materials person, assembly and injection molding operators, an industrial engineer, an area supervisor, and a few employees from outside the area was formed. After spending day one in training and mapping out the current state process, the team discovered significant waste in the process:

  • Daily material shortages resulting in significant overtime costs/reprioritization
  • Inefficient planning for changeovers in the injection molding department due to shifting schedule/priorities
  • Out of cycle work: Operators were doing their own material handling and preparation
  • Excessive WIP (10 days)

  • After analyzing material usage and variability in usage, the team created and properly sized a supermarket of plastic materials. The system would work as follows:
  • Material handlers would pull from the supermarket into the assembly cells, replenishing point-of-use inventory using a 2-bin system. That is, as bins of plastic parts are emptied, the empty bin was used as a signal to replenish material to the cells.
  • As materials in the supermarket were consumed (moved into assembly) a trigger point (visually indicated by the number of bins remaining) was reached. When the trigger point was reached, a kanban card would be pulled and delivered to the injection molding lead.
  • The injection molding lead would place the kanban on a scheduling board in sequence.
  • The injection molding machines would run product according to the kanban on the scheduling board and replenish the supermarket.

  • The new system resulted in a 90% reduction in shortages and 70% reduction in WIP (from 10 days to 3 days).

    Click here to subscribe to our free e-newsletter Learning to Lean and receive a free template plus articles and videos each month.